Metapoetics:
Definitions of Poetics
(These are all happily online elsewhere on the Creative Critical website (with a new, 2021, introduction: https://creativecritical.net/gathering-from-the-past/
I reproduce the first few here only)
Poetics is a discipline, though a flexible one.
Poetics is a discourse, though an intermittent mercurial one.
Poetics is a writer-centred, self-organising activity.
Poetics is a way of letting writers question what they think they
know.
Poetics is a way of allowing creative writing dialogue with
itself, beyond the monologic of commentary or reflection.
Poetics exists for oneself and for others, to produce, to quote
Rachel Blau DuPlessis, ‘a permission to continue’. (DuPlessis 1990: 156)
Poetics can stop being absorbed by the metalanguage of literary theory
or criticism by asserting its own claims as a discourse, a language game with
its own players, rules and purposes.
Poetics in hybrid, fragmentary, collage, playful, jokey,
patapoetical, forms, avoids cooption into the explication of the writing that
results.
Poetics’ function is both oriented towards, and in, new form.
*
Poetics is the product of the process of reflection upon writings,
and upon the act of writing, gathering from the past and from others,
speculatively casting into the future.
*
Return to part one (and links to all 6 parts of this version of The
Necessity of Poetics) here.