Showing posts with label Berlin Bursts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Berlin Bursts. Show all posts

Monday, January 20, 2020

'Prison Camp Violin, Riga' anthologised in Carol Rumens' 'Guardian Poem' book Smart Devices


I am very pleased to say that I have had my ‘Poem of the Week’ Guardian poem, ‘Prison Camp Violin, Riga’ anthologised by Carol Rumens in her Smart Devices: 52 poems from The Guardian, which is published by Carcanet, and may be ordered here:

https://www.carcanet.co.uk/cgi-bin/indexer?product=9781784107796


Carol Rumens has been contributing ‘Poem of the Week’ to the Guardian for more than a dozen years: that’s more than 624 blogs! She’s a poet-reader, not an academic. She is fascinated by the new, but her interest is instructed by the classic poems she has read. They make her ear demanding: when it hears that something, it perks up. She perks up. This is a book of the poems with her commentaries.

‘A poem is a small (or large) machine made of words.’ Rumens partly agrees with William Carlos Williams in her fine introduction, but she develops the conceit, seeing each poem ‘as a more flexible instrument, a miniature neo-cortex, that super-connective, super-layered smartest device of the mammalian brain’. I think I agree. We are beyond mechanical or organic metaphors now and are safely in a cybernetic connecting nexus.

Her mode, though, is not to operate at this level of generality. Her close readings pick at the particularities of the poem (though she does offer some context, where necessary).

There are 52 poets in the book and they are roughly arranged to take us through the year, so I may well read the book that way. I am looking forward to re-encountering work by Fred D’Aguiar, Denise Riley, John Ashbery, Elaine Feinstein, RF Langley, Jean ‘Binta’ Breeze, Ian Gregson, WS Graham, Billy Mills, John Kinsella, Yves Bonnefoy, Anne Stevenson, and all the others whose work I don’t know very well, or who are, indeed, new names to me. 


You can still locate all the poems and commentaries online (not just the 52). 


You can still read my poem and Carol’s commentary in The Guardian here.

I read it here:



I also say a little more here about the poem and about where it has been published. (It has a ‘twin’ poem too.)


Carol was born in Forest Hill, South London, in 1944. She has held various literary posts, including the Northern Art Fellowship, and poetry residencies located at Queen’s University Belfast, University College Cork, Stockholm University and the Harvard Centre for Hellenic Studies, Nafplio. Rumens has published twenty poetry collections, the latest of which is The Mixed Urn (Sheep Meadow Press, 2019). She is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature, and Visiting Professor of Creative Writing at the University of Bangor, Gwynedd. This is where I met her (only the once, so far, unfortunately, when I was also ‘visiting’, as external examiner in Creative Writing). I’d like to thank her once for choosing the poem for The Guardian and even more so for selecting it for this fascinating book. 


Carol Rumens lecturing

Monday, July 23, 2018

Robert Sheppard: my 'Prison Camp Violin, Riga' is Guardian Poem of the Week

I am pleased to say that my poem ‘Prison Camp Violin’ was the Guardian poem of the week: the week beginning 23rd July 2018. I would like to thank Carol Rumens for selecting it, and for writing an insightful commentary on the poem and its poetics.




That link should work, even after the 'week'; if not: try the generic link (and this gives you access to Carol's weekly choice and commentaries):





Thanks to all the people who have shown such interest in the poem in this showing. This poem, on its own, appears in my History or Sleep: Selected Poems, but was originally published in Berlin Bursts, paired with another Riga poem as part of a 'Riga Duet'. Both of these books are still available and may be read about and purchased here and here.  
 

The poem also appears on this blog, here, where it is paired with its twin poem, which is about another musical instrument (a mute piano this time) fashioned by Latvian inmates of Soviet prison camps. You'll also find another, unrelated, poem about Riga. I saw the musical instruments in Riga's Museum of Occupation. The Poet's Room was a strange room in another museum, as described.


Read here about the 'Sheppard' Symposium held last year at Edge Hill. This year there will be a book based on its discussions. I've noticed that links to my Shearsman volumes have been changed, so here they are in raw form, but you can discern the titles for them. They might be of use to any newcomers to my work who might find themselves here. I have a website here where I write about my work.  





More posts in September. I'm having my annual break from blogging and Twitter.

Friday, May 19, 2017

Ship of Fool press Exhibition: Looking Thru' a Hole in the Wall (Sheppard/Farrell)

'Looking Thru' A Hole in the Wall' is a series of poems ('Berlin Bursts' re-printed in both Berlin Bursts and History or Sleep: Selected Poems) and images that derived from our stay in Berlin. The images, produced by varying means use images of The Wall. The poor chap below is being pulled out of a drain, for example. Published in 2010. There are some unbound copies of this work which are still available: email robertsheppard39@gmail.com. They'd be £3 each...




Visit the hub post to take you to all the posts concerning the Ship of Fools exhibition here

Friday, March 24, 2017

Robert Sheppard: Tentatives (poem for Roy Fisher, offered again IM))



Tentatives



                                    for Roy Fisher at 80


Between buildings brushed
By bitter wind

Bodies chatter
Chilled equivocation

Sliced by splintered screen
Of sinking reflections

As some else
Thing resonates

A minor chord
Among flurries tinkling

Lost in
Tingles of thing



Hoist from the purest
Lyric a catch

To pull up the stepped lines
Silvered in living daylights

A neck ridged with bone barely
Turning on a pillow breathing fast

Obstinate anchorage
Slowly

Turning


 


Wind cuts sunlight
Leaf-glitter tells you it’s there

Pushes so hard it could bend
Light if you chose to believe

which you do it makes it
cowl like a bush in a gust curling

Into its own grey withdrawal
Terrified of its black heart



Sun’s low disk
Sinks

Throws long shadows lawns of
Dark stretching back from flaming

Brickwork the faces of buildings
Distant towers

Glint buckled fire for a
Second then gutter

Lost reclaimed
By the order of place some

Where at the periphery stretches
A god created by gospels

That thread between things
Like gossamer like culture       


Note: I am at the moment writing a new poem for Roy, not quite in memoriam, because I wrote it on the train to work in a state where I didn't know whether to believe the single tweet I'd read about his death,, which seemed to appear and then disappear before I left. But the appearance of one of the Roy Fisher doubles who populate Britain (cousins all of the 'actor' who plays the narrator in The Ship's Orchestra) on the bus seemed to be a representative of the neither living nor dead. That's what the poem is about, a veritable Roy Fisher theme in a Roy Fisher wrapping, I hope. I hope it also sees the light of day. By the time I got to work, tweets from authoritative sources acknowedged his passing. And then, later in the day, word of David Kennedy's death. Then later: the London attack. For today, the poem is on the drawing board, as is another Wyatt/Petrarch poem, written this morning, one which glancingly mentions the terrible (but foiled) attack on Westminster Bridge. 14.19

More on Roy Fisher here:








Thursday, March 16, 2017

Robert Sheppard: Inaugural Lecture PART 4; Poems

Parts one and two and three (the last three days' posts) should be read before this final part

Poems [1]

don’t normally wear a suit       don’t normally wear a tie       not at a reading      (laughter)       not when I’m reading poems       that’s all      All poems        (single catcall from audience at disrobing)     I knew you’d say something       All poems stage their meanings at a critical remove from their occasions, sources, influences and poetics. Sometimes poems subvert such complex and lucid notions as ‘complexity’ and ‘lucidity’, to produce poems that are anything but complex and lucid in an attempt to re-define      those things       In any case, poems … run ahead of the conjectures we make      the conjectures run ahead of the poems at different times     I’m going to read     I’m going to turn this into a brief poetry reading       partly because I believe that the poetry reading is one of the provisional institutions of linguistically innovative poetry or whatever you want to call it       and one of the functions of it is to flog books       I thought I’d do that       I have some books here       and there’s one thing free       and also there’s something else that’s common with  poetry readings       that’s a      that’s a trip to the hostelry afterwards       I know there’s a bun-fight immediately after this       but there could be an after after       I think I will simply delegate the Buck I’ th’Vine as a possible       venue       so here are five poems       they’re all metapoems       they do what I was talking about       this is what I wrote for the Alan Halsey reading here as part of the series Ailsa (Cox) and I run from the writing department       I decided to do a kind of introduction for him       I kind of see this as you know when you go home and you find three answerphone messages from the same person      it also rhymes and       I tell students ‘rhyme is a crime’       but they never quite get the irony of me saying that       so I’ve got the maximum number of rhymes



The Hello Poem

for Alan Halsey




Hello poem, it’s me again. I’m
the voice that lives upstairs. You


hear me reeling across my floor,
your ceiling, as I dance about my


affairs. And you about yours, not
miming my sound, un-


rhyming your eyes as they rise,
faltering, toward me, from the ground.



                                    *



Hello poem, it’s me again, the
other side of your world,


speaking long distance
straight


around your curve, racing
like a tycoon’s jet


to overtake the dawn
and possess tomorrow.




                                    *



Hello poem, it’s me again. You
ran away with yourself to


stage your new self’s forming. I am
the silence that inhabits your zero.




this is a poem called






Another Poem


The scribe of the poem knows nothing
but he embodies every word you hold.
He’s not an original. He’s a solid
conduit, form rather than wave or
particle. He’s left-handed, and his block
fist covers every word once it’s formed.
The eyes he turns to us
in his mirror
            look away.
Careful not to smudge, he crouches low,
reversing the verse, furrowing his plough.
The poem tells of flowers and trees,
naming names you recognise from other
poems, but you could never make them out
in the wild. Did he say ‘Wild’? No,
he didn’t, as it happens. Neither did
the poem. You’re making it up. You think
it should be you alone and the words
agreeing to differ. But you watch his fist
pounding the lines: Snouts nuzzling the moon
grass or Gifting broken gusts. The poem
has barely recovered from his scratches, yet
you’re making to scribble links in its margins,
calming and charmless. Will you then tear
his calligraphy back, peel it off to leave
the wounded poem yours, a dripping pelt?
He fashions the final words. Waves of feeling rush
towards this hooded moment. His dream is to be power-
less as the endless poem.

                                                Then he
inscribes, in mirror-script: The scribe of this poem
knows it all




this is called ‘Not Another Poem’     partly because it’s in prose       and partly (laughs)        through exasperation       this actually       I made allusion to an essay I wrote on the avant-garde       this is also part of that       what I was attempting to do was  to write something that was neither poetry or prose nor a critical article but it’s a response to that book but I’m not sure you need to know that book



Not Another Poem

after Krzysztof Ziarek




Often I am permitted to return to a field. And it is full of forces

Something is happening here, saying whatever, but saying all the same. But not. The same there’s nothing to exchange. No need to

Forces don’t build in power. Or domination. A thoughtful, forceful relinquishing

Inside this field you are safe but not safe. All that is the world is not. The world. A bullet flies as the idea of a bullet (flies) but its trajectory is turned. To words like ‘sleet’ turning to ‘snow’. To slow. It is a bullet that stands. In relation to every new thing

Everything here is transformed, every thing (out there) interrupted. A snow-bullet  frozen mid-air becomes off-centre of a new constellation from where we see it transfigured our selves. What we think of it is the new thing

There’s more of it. And more and more of it in a different way there’s nothing. We can do with what we find here. It’s not stock. This is where. I want to make some thing. Something elsed, but disavowed – disallowed, even – in this

A carafe, That Is a blue guitar. Beyonding art

I don’t want to only make relations. I make. The gangly girl in black-framed glasses in my making. I make her trip back from her car to number 99 in her strappy party shoes to root out the Christmas present she has forgotten. Then I will make the thoughts she has as she returns

Outside of her there is domination. House numbers telephone wires. Humming with Power. Not poetry and the antinomies. Satellite navigation. Data shadow. Inside. They share the world is not escaped, but elsed

Empower me to be. So unpowered. In my relinquishment by distance not elevation to keep the saying unsaid. To speak against is to speak. Let me do it I need to do it but let me speak something elsed. From somewhere else. Of something

I have made something. For you. Now you are someone else

another poem which relates to a reading       this time I didn’t write it as an introduction       I wrote it the next day       when John James came here to read       he has the poem with the line ‘I beg you to free this boy’ and I introduced him with the words ‘I beg you to hear this boy’       so I took this up the next day whilst he was busily working with the second year students here I wrote the poem for him



As Yet Untitled Poem


for John James



I beg you to hear this boy. And hear him out.
His morning poem you’re in, now,
is neatly creased as a crisp new shirt, stiff-
backed and clipped on its cardboard torso, posed.

It trips you over the cat from the film you’ve never
seen, as you search for your spectacles.
I use my enormous brain to seek the signals
they emit. We are both The Prisoner

on this island, Crusoes of overlapping surveillance.
Sleep is where we’ve come from, a misty place                           
of drizzled desire and mordant fear. The fog has
lifted, real enough, for the expedition that must

set off for the explanation. Your house-
guest, a sort of vapour that
an opening door dispels, coughs his soft pardons.
Serious poetry is back in town:

the Unfinished Alba of the Unknown
Troubadour, whose vida is word for word. The
beloved of this lyric is the hero of that epic, where
sometimes I did seek, I beg you now to flee this boy.



and my final one       this final one comes from this sequence of metapoems       but it also belongs in the ‘September 12’       poem as well       I need to retreat behind here for the use of my hands[2]     it’s short


Reading ‘The Poem…’.




The poem sends itself from anywhere
to your little box there it replays it
over and over. No redial no recall.
Dead ears drop in your lap. Pause.

No reply possible, skip onto Message Two:
I can see the twin cathedrals twisting below.
I should keep this thing switched off it affects
the instruments it doesn’t matter now terror

has been hijacked by artifice. Commas cower
along Hope St as we torque above them
out of control spluttering towards the radio tower
full stop. That was your fake captain speaking

through me printing fear backwards through his script.
You receive my wild meaning in his spliced last words


thank you     (applause)       thank you





[1] I have attempted to transcribe the verbal introductions to these poems (in italics), which includes me reading and abandoning  prepared text (in ordinary type) before the lecture transforms into a poetry reading. I have borrowed a number of transcription conventions from the ‘talk poems’ of David Antin.
[2] I cupped my hands to make my voice more like an intercom as I read the italicised lines, and needed to rest my text on the lectern I had read the lecture from. During the poetry reading, after having removed my jacket and tie, I moved out into the audience, swaying and moving as I read, as is my custom, advancing some way up the aisle dividing the audience. So at the end of the performance I was back in the position I started from.

Tuesday, May 03, 2016

Robert Sheppard: Supplanting the Postmodern (notes)

Unrevised journal notes on Rudrum, David, and Stavris, Nicholas, eds., Supplanting the Postmodern: An Anthology of Writings on the Arts and Culture of the Early 21st Century. New York, etc: Bloomsbury, 2015. Details here.

 Supplanting the Postmodern
 
31st December 2015: I’ve just this morning finished Supplanting the Postmodern, a bewildering anthology of views of what happened after postmodernism ‘died’ (a common supposition of the book). While it disgracefully doesn’t mention poetry, and while some of its contributors (‘Stuckism!’) are plainly silly, the common perception that the classic postmodernist ‘dogmas’ (those that are now absorbed and clarified in the summarising literature) no longer fit contemporary (i.e. 21st Century) art, literature, culture, society and technologies, is persuasive.

Rudrum’s afterword brings into play a quote that haunted my reading of the previous 300 pages: Lyotard’s observation that ‘postmodernism is not modernism at its end, but in a nascent state, and that state is recurrent’ (337), which deals deftly with false chronologies (though September 11th, as in my ‘September 12th’, did mark a break for me [See here]) – and also brings a constant sense of crisis to the contemporary. Rudrun’s use of the same parts of Rancière that I use [in The Meaning of Form, see here], to show the oscillation between possible views of the relationships of ‘art’ and ‘life’, and to pitch that view onto some of the ‘post’-postmodernisms projected, to suggest, in a nod back to [Gerald] Graff, that there is a pendulum swing between views (‘metamodernism’ provides this metaphor: we’re swinging between modernist and pomo paradigms, and not settling). There’s no ‘break’.

Stavris, in his afterword, argues that the ‘anything goes’ of Lyotard (what of [Paul] Feyerabend?) has given way to ‘a contemporary culture of anxiety’ in which ‘artists attempt to overcome the uncertainties of the human condition in the twenty-first century by reaching out for a renewed period of sincerity. Authenticity is the new focus for the present day artist. The assertion that “Anything Goes” is no longer the case, nor is it a commonly felt sentiment: the desire for relaxation has been replaced by the desire to formulate some kind of grip on reality… This development has occurred in response to a culture of fear’ (350), a ‘climate of anxiety’ (351). ‘The result is a strong resurgence in the presentation, or rejuvenation, of self-hood and identity …’ (352). ‘The artist is no longer concerned with postmodern displacement strategies; instead, their primary aim is to convey a transition, a positive desire on the part of the subject to reclaim wholeness and selfhood in a globalized culture that is cloaked in uncertainty … Our occupation of a cultural landscape that strives for freedom and autonomy is met with a realigned focus on truth …’ (353). Realisms and experiment co-exist; religion and spirituality haunt the scene … classic return of the repressed, actually.

Does any of this reverberate? Critically, my formalist bent is a return to artistic autonomy and human agency in reading, but then I have never believed ‘the death of the author’ in its common misreadings. A diarist of such prodigious energy, I can hardly have subscribed to the ‘death of the subject’. The birth of the reading subject has always been important [to me]. Something interesting happened towards the end of Warrant Error – the need to assert human values and to express them more directly, [see below] and in the current 14 liners [the sequence ‘It’s Nothing’, see here] I’m finding that they keep vacillating between their fictive constructedness and the desire to attain (I suppose) a realist epistemology. ‘Metaxis … simultaneously here, there, and nowhere’. (325) Oscillation, betweenness, is another theme [of the book, not my poems] (so is the role of technology in creating the appearance of the real, and engendering a (false) sense of human autonomy, represented by the docusoap and the ‘personalized’ playlist, respectively. Of course, ‘fear’ is the fear of economic downturn, terrorism, and eco-disaster, in the above accounts: September 12th and the Era of Immiseration, as co-existent extremes).

Obviously, this summary is too clenched, my reading too recent, to come to conclusions. (Not that I’m trying to: I’m trying to use the book for poetics.) I see parallels with things I’ve been doing, but it is noticeable that most of the referenced art and literature I’ve not [seen or] read. It perhaps strengthens my resolve about parts of my recent work (the end of Warrant Error, the ‘Poems Against Death’, these ‘domestic’ poems [elsewhere I describe ‘It’s Nothing’, half complete, as ‘about domestic qualia, and above all, a kind of haunted John Jamesian pleasure]) that gesture towards selfhood and transparency – though it will never be the simple default mode of the Movement Orthodoxy, still pervasive, I’d say. [Later I write: ‘They do keep reticulating, in the sense of becoming more self-conscious the more they are conscious of self – that diminished, displaced, but present, “me”. See here.]    

The theorists are often clear that art is striving for an autonomy or a freedom that it will never achieve: it refuses the simpler PoMo gesture of articulating a tired resignation in the face of received ‘impossibilities’: it has never seemed persuasive on that front.

I’m not expecting such a book to really tell me what’s going on. In some ways the example of the fossilization of postmodern ideas speaks against such epochal adventures, but it is interesting to see commonalities, in one’s work, and to generally suggest that postmodernism (a term I haven’t used (much) since 1987, when I defined it quite precisely [see ‘Flashlight Propositions 1987, here]) no longer offers a dominant paradigm, that things have shifted. Yet the alternatives don’t convince: they register a general impulse. It doesn’t answer where conceptual writing might lie, where kinds of inventive translation might lie. [See here and here for those.]

The ‘altermodernist (artist) is a homo viator,’ write Vermeulen and Van den Akker of Bourriaud, ‘liberated from (an obsession with) his/her origins, free to travel and explore, perceiving anew the global landscape and the “terra incognita” of history’, (312) a view which suggests that ‘multiform unfinish’ is a strong position, not an evasive one (which was the fear), ‘enthusiasm as well as irony’, (318), ‘to pursue a horizon that is forever receding’ (325).

Trajectory rather than position. Unfinish. [See here and here.]

*

24th April 2016: The entry ends there; perhaps I'm trying to pick up a few themes I thought I’d not captured already, particularly ‘enthusiasm’. I interestingly pass over the ‘religious’ aspects (although I remember thinking that humanists and the Brights might have something to fight for and against at last, not least of all in response to killings of secular academics in  Bangladesh and elsewhere). The observation that postmodernism and post-post modernism will co-exist remained undeveloped but is present at a couple of points. They were, are, notes I want to come back to. Here are two poems that seem to have been in the back of my mind, from the end of Warrant Error (see here):


Two poems from ‘Out of Nowhere’ from Warrant Error

 
You build from song
an architecture of tumbles

a dance of stumbles on a shelf of air.
You name this the space left by the human.
You excavate Babylon or the strata of resting Jews
and the ribbons of tight ink on Pinkas Synagogue wall
with the surnames’ bejewelled rubrication

(Whenever erased they’re re-written
the act of their scrubbing
inscribed anew)

Stones leaning splinter through time
for those with no names
possess no death. You ex-
hume the ex-human in human unfinish

 


After the Last Word
of the dead text necrophiles come
our next words
which yet survive

as reasons
for living happily out
of nowhere and now

and then on to multitopia bearing
the stories so far

whose passions read as co-
eval becomings
geographies of affect in
capital Isness where
human unfinish is all about

 
The first also appears in my Selected Poems History or Sleep (unlike the second, which, incidentally, is a collage of quotatioins from everybody from Philip Roth to Doreen Massey). See here for details.

Friday, January 08, 2016

Robert Sheppard: How I selected History or Sleep: Selected Poems


I have been explaining quite a lot on this blog, here in particular, about the de-selection of poems from History or Sleep: Selected Poems, my second book of 2015, just out. More here, too.

I’ve said very little about the process of selection, though. I didn’t have a policy or guidelines, although, even while I was preparing the text of Complete Twentieth Century Blues in 2007 or thereabouts, I was compiling lists of candidates for a possible ‘selected poems’, and I found I had other, earlier, lists to add them to. These helped, because consensus over choices probably indicated the right ones to pick. I didn’t ask anybody else to help, not even Patricia, though Scott Thurston, when presented with the contents, rattled off a list of unrepresented works. ‘Space,’ was the excuse for most of the omissions.

I wanted to be representative of different works, styles and periods (!), as well as obviously showing what I imperfectly judged to be the best work. I favoured short pieces over long and (taking my cue from Peter Hughes’ Shearsman ‘Selected’) I wasn’t afraid to excerpt from longer sequences to increase representation. I had to.

The existence of Twentieth Century Blues caused a problem, given its structure. (Read about that here.) Let me explain why/how: All of my texts written 1990-2000 formed part of this time-based network of texts, ‘Twentieth Century Blues’, and some earlier ones were given membership of it at certain points. It was, to my surprise, published whole as Complete Twentieth Century Blues (2008), with poetics statements and a detailed index of its 75 parts and its 97 ‘strands’. (I might put this index on this blog at some point to indicate the mad intricacy of this scheme.) Strands of texts ran across the numbering. I described ‘Twentieth Century Blues’ as a


net/
            (k)not

- work(s)

(Indeed that glyph is the 14th part of ‘Twentieth Century Blues’, the poem ‘Untitled’ in its entirety.) The way the strands work can be seen, if you have the index, in History or Sleep, in the ‘Empty Diary’ poems, both within the ‘Empty Diaries 1901-1990’ sequence and beyond. More obliquely, ‘Empty Diary 1990’ is also ‘Internal Exile II’. ‘The Materialisation of Soap 1947’ is the fourth ‘History of Sensation’; ‘Mesopotamia’ is the first in that strand, while ‘Killing Boxes’ is ‘Mesopotamia 2’, but it is also ‘Melting Borders 2’, and thus linked with both the poems of those titles (at least). And so on.

For the selection in this book, though, I thought it best to omit this numbering and the index, while acknowledging its role in the writing, and its uses to the reading, of the poems. And also to reduce the impeding of the reading process, if the reader is new to my work. It seemed better to present separate poems as discrete entities (although there are series there). 

The poems are arranged in broadly chronological order, and I’ve put a newly recovered poem up front, from 1983, ‘Round Midnight’, a poem about Stan Tracey playing Thelonious Monk. (See here.) It sets the tone. I’m also pleased that the book ends with one of Sophie Poppmeier’s supposed poems (fictional poems supposedly written by a fictional poet (see here and here for that on-going work!)): ‘Book 1 Poem 1’. In my end is her beginning (if that doesn’t sound too rude). (It does.) The book opens with chaos and invention; ends with changing one’s life.  

The appearance of a number of poems in both Tin Pan Arcadia and Complete Twentieth Century Blues allowed me to be more severe with their de-selection and this accounts both for selections (or the lack of them). These poems have been seen quite a lot.  

So what did I end up with? Well, this:


Round Midnight

One for William Carlos Williams

Returns

Strategies

Twin Poem

from The Hungry Years: an Unwriting

from Mesopotamia

The Materialisation of Soap 1947

Looking North 2

Internal Exile

Living Daylights

Coming Down from St George’s Hill

His Furious Skip

Three Poems by Wayne Pratt from The Penguin Book of British Parrots

The Magnetic Letter

Melting Borders

from Smokestack Lightning

from Killing Boxes

Fucking Time 56

from Empty Diaries 1901-1990

from The Lores

History or Sleep

Three Hundred Word Sonnets: from The Lores, Book 8; from Entries: Empty Diary 1996; Small Voice 1

The Push Up Combat Bikini: Empty Diary 2000

A Voice Without

Only the Eyes are Left

Parody and Pastoral

from Reading The Reader

National Security, Huyton 1940

Three Figures Climb

Erotic Elegy

Prison Camp Violin, Riga

from Berlin Bursts

from Warrant Error

Four Poems Against Death

Another Poem

Yet Another Poem

As Yet Untitled Poem

The Given, part one

from Arrival

Standing by

Fictional Poems from A Translated Man : from The Masks; from The Light; from EUOIA.


I hope that you will want to buy the whole thing. Here.

There is a review of the book, by Steve Waling, here. A set list of one of the launch readings and links to further reviews here.


Friday, December 18, 2015

Robert Sheppard: Liverpool University Reading 2014 video now online (set list)

      

Just over year ago today I read at the University of Liverpool in the Miriam Allott series, and it was put online, here. (Not sure it remains there.) The set list and an account of the reading may be read here. I knew it was being filmed so I was on my worst behaviour. But on good form, I think. Here's the list again to help navigating the video if you only want to watch a bit.

Set List





from Berlin Bursts

A Voice Without (which may be read here, among other texts)
Yet Another Poem (a draft may be read here)

from Warrant Error:

Poems 1-5 from ‘September 12’
5 Poems from ‘Out of Nowhere’ (some of these)

from Berlin Bursts



The first 4 ‘Poems Against Death’.


From ‘Petrarch 3: a derivative derive for Tim Atkins and Peter Hughes after Harry Mathews and Nicholas Moore (See a different set list here), now the first 'line' of the super-sonnet The Song Nets.



The ‘original’ Petrarch translation
(Read it in its original place for its original purpose here.)
Iron Maiden (sub-dom poem)
Pet (doggie poem; here)
Petrak: The First English Sonnet, Good Friday 4001
Now then now then and now (the ‘Jimmy Savile' poem; you could hear a pin drop)
twittersonnet (after Rene Van Valckenborch; read his twittersonnet and twitterodes here. And of my own later use of the form here)
Vow
VE Day 1985 (after Wayne Pratt)

Read more about Warrant Error here.
Read more about Berlin Bursts here.


'Petrarch 3' is now in print, see here and here.
Many of the poems I read appear in my History or Sleep: Selected Poems, which I was selecting around that time. See here.

Thanks Sandeep Parmar for organising.